Chinese Arbitration: Rules of the Game
Recently, Russian companies have begun to consider China as a venue for resolving international commercial disputes. However, despite the attractiveness of the prospect of a swift and efficient hearing, the cost of international arbitration in China remains a relevant issue.

According to an article in Kommersant, unlike state courts, commercial arbitration offers shorter case processing times (6-12 months), but arbitration fees vary. For example, CIETAC is the most expensive, while BAC is more economical, according to Chuck Peng, Head of KKMP China Desk. According to other market experts, overall, the cost of services in China is comparable to that in Russia, but may appear higher due to engaging English-speaking specialists with experience in international projects.

Read also
05/29/2025
On May 23rd, amendments to legislation came into effect in Hong Kong, allowing foreign companies to re-register in this special administrative region of China. Now, Russian entrepreneurs seeking an alternative to “unfriendly” jurisdictions can consider Hong Kong alongside the UAE, Mauritius, or Seychelles.
05/28/2025
Choosing a jurisdiction for resolving disputes with Chinese counterparts is a complex task, requiring careful analysis of numerous factors, including the enforceability of a judgment and the specific legislation of both countries. Kommersant Publishing House asked Chuck Peng, Head of KKMP China Desk, where businesses turn to resolve disputes arising from Russian-Chinese contracts.
05/27/2025
The evolving market has amplified the value of Russian firms in sourcing and coordinating local counsel, while also creating greater opportunities for independent work on foreign law, as noted by Alyona Kucher, KKMP Senior Partner, in her article on Pravo.ru. This has effectively transformed Russian law firms into modern-day Russian “Ilfs” – resourceful problem-solvers navigating complex challenges.