Valerian spoke about the relation of academic activity to legal practice, in particular:
How does academic activity help in legal practice?
Is it possible / necessary to combine academic activity with legal practice?
Is it fair to treat lawyers as either theorists or practitioners?
The report highlighted examples when academics had a strong impact on practice and shaped certain trends (determining the outcome of certain disputes, judicial practice generally or legislation). And reverse examples, when practical needs called for deeper research in certain areas for developing appropriate regulation (in particular, new matters not regulated by law).