The decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court in the Raven Russia case - Stanislav Dobshevich comments for Legal Report
KKMP partner Stanislav Dobshevich gave comments for Legal Report on the decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court to uphold the interim measures granted on the application of the Prosecutor General's Office seeking to challenge the sale of the Raven Russia’s business.

On October 1, the Moscow City Arbitration Court (MCA) ordered to continue the interim measures imposed earlier on the application of the Prosecutor General's Office, who believe that Raven Russia's transactions involving commercial real estate were a sham. These measures relate to the warehouses acquired by Raven Group from a British company that has left the Russian market.

 

These measures have a critical impact on the business operations. The tenants of the real estate are Russian largest retailers, marketplaces, pharmaceutical and manufacturing companies. Any disruptions in their operations may further complicate the logistics that is already under pressure due to various negative factors.

 

The immediate consequences of the restrictive measures and injunctions instigated by the Prosecutor General's Office may seem not that significant, but the longer the dispute lasts, the greater the damage will be to the landlord and its business.

 

The interim measures imposed on the application of the Prosecutor General's Office do appear excessive. For the purposes of the public authority's claim, it was sufficient to limit the transfer of the ownership title to the real property rather than prohibit all transactions with it.

 

Raven's business is based on the consummation and extension of lease agreements, therefore, any restriction on transactions involving arrested properties will lead to material adverse effects. Raven will not be able to enter into new lease agreements, register side letters to existing lease agreements necessary, e.g., for extending pharmaceutical licenses by its tenants or bring in new tenants for vacated properties.

The full article is available on Legal.Report.

Read also
05/29/2025
On May 23rd, amendments to legislation came into effect in Hong Kong, allowing foreign companies to re-register in this special administrative region of China. Now, Russian entrepreneurs seeking an alternative to “unfriendly” jurisdictions can consider Hong Kong alongside the UAE, Mauritius, or Seychelles.
05/28/2025
Choosing a jurisdiction for resolving disputes with Chinese counterparts is a complex task, requiring careful analysis of numerous factors, including the enforceability of a judgment and the specific legislation of both countries. Kommersant Publishing House asked Chuck Peng, Head of KKMP China Desk, where businesses turn to resolve disputes arising from Russian-Chinese contracts.
05/27/2025
The evolving market has amplified the value of Russian firms in sourcing and coordinating local counsel, while also creating greater opportunities for independent work on foreign law, as noted by Alyona Kucher, KKMP Senior Partner, in her article on Pravo.ru. This has effectively transformed Russian law firms into modern-day Russian “Ilfs” – resourceful problem-solvers navigating complex challenges.