International Arbitration: Why Is It Needed for Russian Business Today?
In Pravo.ru editorial, KKMP Partner Stanislav Dobshevich and other experts discuss how arbitration works in the new conditions and what approaches are used by businesses to protect their interests.

Before 2022, Western arbitration centers were top choice for domestic businesses: the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris (ICC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC). These venues had an impeccable reputation, and their decisions were easily enforced worldwide. Large Russian corporations, energy and metallurgical giants referred their disputes for resolution there for decades. However, according to Stanislav, the focus has shifted from west to east, and in today’s conditions, choosing the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) appears more practicable:

 

This center is among the most respected in the world, has the status of a permanent arbitration institution in Russia, and is well suited for working with sanctioned entities. The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) can also be considered, although it is less open-minded and popular abroad than HKIAC. However, referring disputes to it for resolution will be quite inexpensive….SIAC [also] remains a convenient place to consider disputes involving Russian parties, despite the targeted sanctions imposed by Singapore.

 

The demand for arbitration from both Russian companies and their counterparties is still in place. In these conditions, businesses and their advisors have to find solutions and look at other jurisdictions. And there are solutions.

 

If resolving disputes by international arbitration was previously a requirement of Western counterparties, now Russian companies that shifted their focus on the Eastern region, face similar requests from their Asian colleagues. Therefore, arbitration will continue to play an important role for disputes involving businesses from Russia, regardless of the country of origin of its counterparty.

Stanislav is also convinced that the future of arbitration is inextricably linked to technological transformation.

 

As part of the global trend towards digitalization, the process will become more technology-savvy: hearings will increasingly be held online, and new virtual platforms for exchanging procedural documents will appear.

Read also
05/29/2025
On May 23rd, amendments to legislation came into effect in Hong Kong, allowing foreign companies to re-register in this special administrative region of China. Now, Russian entrepreneurs seeking an alternative to “unfriendly” jurisdictions can consider Hong Kong alongside the UAE, Mauritius, or Seychelles.
05/28/2025
Choosing a jurisdiction for resolving disputes with Chinese counterparts is a complex task, requiring careful analysis of numerous factors, including the enforceability of a judgment and the specific legislation of both countries. Kommersant Publishing House asked Chuck Peng, Head of KKMP China Desk, where businesses turn to resolve disputes arising from Russian-Chinese contracts.
05/27/2025
The evolving market has amplified the value of Russian firms in sourcing and coordinating local counsel, while also creating greater opportunities for independent work on foreign law, as noted by Alyona Kucher, KKMP Senior Partner, in her article on Pravo.ru. This has effectively transformed Russian law firms into modern-day Russian “Ilfs” – resourceful problem-solvers navigating complex challenges.