Vadim Nikitin Spoke at the Conference "Construction. Risks. Insurance. 2.0"
On March 12th, the Construction. Risks. Insurance. 2.0 conference was held in Moscow, where critically important issues were discussed related to the implementation of large-scale projects in current conditions.

The focus was on risk management, insurance coverage, the reinsurance market, securing creditor claims, strengthening creditor involvement in project issues, instruments of sponsor support, and loss adjustment.

As part of the session Consultant’s View – Nuances, Observations, Proposals, Vadim Nikitin, Counsel at KKMP, delivered a report on Balance of Security, Sponsor Support, and Insurance Coverage in Project Financing: A Legal Consultant's View on Problematic Issues.

 

Vadim noted that:

 

Project financing in current conditions significantly deviates from the academic model of complete absence of recourse for creditors to project initiators or project sponsors. At the same time, we can often see opposing positions in practice: on the one hand, there are creditors expecting maximum security, sponsor support, and insurance coverage, and on the other hand, there are initiators believing that financial guarantees on their part make insurance not necessary. In these circumstances, reasonable balancing of the entire set of tools to reduce credit, project, and entrepreneurial risks is extremely important. In his speech at the conference, I sought to show, on the basis of real cases of the Project Financing Factory, both a possible balance and obvious excesses, including 'over-security' of the project.

 

In his presentation, Vadim also highlighted such instruments of creditor control over the payment of insurance compensation as appointing those as beneficiaries and/or recipients of insurance compensation, and the use of collateral under insurance contracts, which is unfamiliar for many companies.

Read also
05/29/2025
On May 23rd, amendments to legislation came into effect in Hong Kong, allowing foreign companies to re-register in this special administrative region of China. Now, Russian entrepreneurs seeking an alternative to “unfriendly” jurisdictions can consider Hong Kong alongside the UAE, Mauritius, or Seychelles.
05/28/2025
Choosing a jurisdiction for resolving disputes with Chinese counterparts is a complex task, requiring careful analysis of numerous factors, including the enforceability of a judgment and the specific legislation of both countries. Kommersant Publishing House asked Chuck Peng, Head of KKMP China Desk, where businesses turn to resolve disputes arising from Russian-Chinese contracts.
05/27/2025
The evolving market has amplified the value of Russian firms in sourcing and coordinating local counsel, while also creating greater opportunities for independent work on foreign law, as noted by Alyona Kucher, KKMP Senior Partner, in her article on Pravo.ru. This has effectively transformed Russian law firms into modern-day Russian “Ilfs” – resourceful problem-solvers navigating complex challenges.