Liability of Russian Subsidiaries for the Debts of Foreign Parent Companies
A special edition of the Dispute Resolution Club featured an article by Stanislav Dobshevich, KKMP Partner and Head of Dispute Resolution Practice, titled “Liability of Russian Subsidiaries for the Debts of Foreign Parent Companies,” dedicated to the Ruling of the Economic Dispute Collegium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the case of PJSC Sovcombank v Citibank N.A. v CB Citibank.

In recent years, Russian courts have begun to hold Russian companies jointly and severally liable for the debts of their foreign parent companies. Courts state that Russian and foreign companies belong to the same group of companies with a unified decision-making center.

As a result, Russian creditors are deprived of the opportunity to recover assets from the Russian company within the group, and abroad, they are refused recovery of debts due to sanctions. This situation indicates the bad faith of foreign holdings, which is sufficient grounds for imposing liability on the Russian companies within the group.

The corporate structure of foreign holdings is specifically designed to evade responsibility: the Russian company within the group conducts business in Russia and generates profits, but the majority of obligations to Russian creditors are assumed by the foreign company within the group.

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation clarified:

  • Belonging to the same group of companies ≠ automatic joint and several liability.

     

  • Courts are obliged to investigate specific circumstances (degree of control, participation in causing harm, etc.).

  • The property segregation of legal entities remains a key principle, but abuse of the corporate structure to the detriment of creditors cannot be tolerated.

Conclusions:

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation did not prohibit holding Russian subsidiaries jointly and severally liable for the debts of foreign companies within the group. However, the application of “piercing the corporate veil” in each case must be justified by the existence of specific exceptional circumstances.

Read also
04/8/2026
The analytical portal Pravo.ru has released the findings of the largest study on legal support for Russian businesses in the United Arab Emirates.
04/8/2026
On April 7, 2026, KKMP Partner Alexander Anichkin and KKMP Counselor Valerian Mamageishvili delivered a lecture as part of the HSE University professional retraining program “Director of the Corporate Governance Department.”
04/7/2026
Valerian Mamageishvili, an advisor at KKMP, delivered a lecture at the Statut Law School on the topic “Tools for Structuring M&A Transactions: Current Issues in Application.” The lecture was part of the Comprehensive Professional Development Program for Corporate Lawyers.